GGL-004, Voting
Not law. Regulates what already happens. This is the one draft that covers things the Constitution genuinely left open: it fixes the weights, forbids substituting a restricted vote, and sets two thirds for an Amendment, but says nothing about how a vote is actually run.
GGL-004: Voting. The words of a vote go up before voting opens, and cannot be changed from then until it closes. If the words are changed after they go up, the vote does not count.
How you vote is secret. You can vote again any time before it closes, and only your last vote counts. Earlier ones are not counted, not published and not shown to anyone. Everyone who votes gets something they can use to check their vote was counted, which does not reveal how they voted.
The President's and Vice President's votes are not secret and are published with the result, because those votes come with the job rather than being a personal choice like everyone else's.
An option wins if it has more than half the weighted votes, or at least two thirds where Amendment VI needs that. If two options tie at the top, nothing wins.
A vote is counted the moment it closes. That happens automatically and nobody has to start it. Once counted, a result cannot be changed, withdrawn or recounted, and it is published with the weights used and enough information for anyone to check the count themselves.
A proposed law or Amendment goes up for people to comment on before it can go to a vote. If anyone comments, the person who proposed it has to publish a proper reply before voting opens.
Notes
Re-casting is the substance here, not a convenience. In an electorate of three, where the President holds a third of the voting power and decides who becomes a citizen, a secret ballot that cannot be recast is secret only until somebody asks to watch. Being able to change it quietly afterwards means there is nothing worth buying and nothing worth standing over you for.
Earlier ballots not being published is easy to get wrong. Publishing the full history in the name of transparency would hand a coercer the exact record that re-casting exists to deny them.
Officer votes being public is a choice worth arguing about. The reason for it: with weighted voting their choice is usually derivable from the published totals anyway, so secrecy would be a claim the Union could not keep. The counter-argument is that an officer is also a person. That is exactly why it belongs in a law the citizens vote on rather than in a settings table.
Certification being automatic is the clause with teeth. If a result only becomes real when somebody presses a button, whoever holds that button can decline to press it, and Amendment I makes that person unremovable.
No fixed number of days. An earlier draft set three days of notice and seven of comment. For three people who speak daily that is a fortnight of waiting to perform a procedure. The law requires that notice and comment happen; the registry sets the periods, and they can be short.